2003 Avanti Studebaker vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Avanti Studebaker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (321 HP @ 3300 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Avanti Studebaker weights approximately 550 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Avanti Studebaker | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Avanti | Cadillac |
| Model | Studebaker | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5952 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2675 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3410 mm | 3310 mm |
