2003 Avanti Studebaker vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Avanti Studebaker is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (306 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Avanti Studebaker weights approximately 745 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Avanti Studebaker | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Avanti | Cadillac |
Model | Studebaker | 62 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6751 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 306 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2775 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3410 mm | 3300 mm |