2003 Avanti Studebaker vs. 2004 BMW M3
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Avanti Studebaker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Avanti Studebaker would be higher. At 5,952 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2003 Avanti Studebaker. (321 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Avanti Studebaker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Avanti Studebaker weights approximately 1126 kg more than 2004 BMW M3.
Because 2003 Avanti Studebaker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (560 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (350 Nm). This means 2003 Avanti Studebaker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Avanti Studebaker | 2004 BMW M3 | |
Make | Avanti | BMW |
Model | Studebaker | M3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5952 cc | 3246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 328 HP |
Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2675 kg | 1549 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3410 mm | 2730 mm |