2003 Avanti Studebaker vs. 2009 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Avanti Studebaker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Avanti Studebaker would be higher. At 6,751 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2003 Avanti Studebaker. (306 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2003 Avanti Studebaker.
Because 2003 Avanti Studebaker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac STS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Avanti Studebaker. (425 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Avanti Studebaker.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Avanti Studebaker | 2009 Cadillac STS-V | |
Make | Avanti | Cadillac |
Model | Studebaker | STS-V |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6751 cc | 4376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 306 HP | 469 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 425 Nm | 595 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3410 mm | 2960 mm |