2003 Avanti Studebaker vs. 2009 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2009 GMC Acadia is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Avanti Studebaker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Avanti Studebaker would be higher. At 6,751 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (306 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2009 GMC Acadia. (284 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker should accelerate faster than 2009 GMC Acadia.
Because 2003 Avanti Studebaker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 GMC Acadia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (425 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 GMC Acadia. (270 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2003 Avanti Studebaker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 GMC Acadia.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Avanti Studebaker | 2009 GMC Acadia | |
Make | Avanti | GMC |
Model | Studebaker | Acadia |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6751 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 306 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 425 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3410 mm | 3030 mm |