2003 Bentley Continental GT vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Bentley Continental GT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bentley Continental GT (552 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bentley Continental GT should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Bentley Continental GT weights approximately 185 kg more than 1960 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Bentley Continental GT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Bentley Continental GT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bentley Continental GT | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bentley | Cadillac |
Model | Continental GT | 62 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Type | W | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 552 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 79 L |