2003 Bentley Continental GT vs. 2009 BMW M3
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bentley Continental GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bentley Continental GT would be higher. At 5,998 cc, 2003 Bentley Continental GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bentley Continental GT (552 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2009 BMW M3. (414 HP @ 8300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bentley Continental GT should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Bentley Continental GT weights approximately 860 kg more than 2009 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Bentley Continental GT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Bentley Continental GT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bentley Continental GT (651 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2003 Bentley Continental GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3. 2003 Bentley Continental GT has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Bentley Continental GT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bentley Continental GT | 2009 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Bentley | BMW |
| Model | Continental GT | M3 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 3999 cc |
| Engine Type | W | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 552 HP | 414 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 8300 RPM |
| Torque | 651 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.2 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 319 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 5 seconds | 5.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 26.2 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.1 L/100km | 12.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 63 L |
