2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 would be higher. At 6,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 (500 HP) has 181 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. (319 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 497 kg more than 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Chevrolet |
| Model | BZ-2001 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6900 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 319 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1697 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1918 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2852 mm |
