2003 BMW 318 vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 BMW 318 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 62 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2003 BMW 318. (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 530 kg more than 2003 BMW 318. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW 318 | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 318 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3210 mm |
