2003 BMW 318 vs. 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 318. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 318 would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (178 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2003 BMW 318. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 318.
Because 2003 BMW 318 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW 318. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 318 (271 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2003 BMW 318 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 318 | 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 318 | PT Dream Cruiser |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 178 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 210 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 101 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2000 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |