2003 BMW 320 vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 320 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2003 BMW 320. (150 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 154 kg more than 2003 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJ (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 320. (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 320 | 2007 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 320 | XJ |
Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1659 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.4 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 85 L |