2003 BMW 325 vs. 1954 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 BMW 325 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2003 BMW 325. (192 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 520 kg more than 2003 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1954 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2003 BMW 325 has manual transmission. 2003 BMW 325 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1954 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW 325 | 1954 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 325 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 5423 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 192 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3290 mm |
