2003 BMW 325 vs. 1996 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 BMW 325 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 325 (192 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ranger. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 325 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1996 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 325 (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Ranger. (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 325 | 1996 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 325 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2840 mm |