2003 BMW 325 vs. 2005 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 325 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2003 BMW 325. (192 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 325 weights approximately 16 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Sebring.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 325. (245 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 325 | 2005 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 325 | Sebring |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1464 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.3 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |