2003 BMW 325 vs. 2005 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 325 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 325 (192 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. (150 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 43 kg more than 2003 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 325 (245 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. (217 Nm). This means 2003 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 325 | 2005 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 325 | Sebring |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1523 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.3 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |