2003 BMW 325 vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 325 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 BMW 325. (192 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 325 weights approximately 360 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (271 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 325. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 325 | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 325 | 6 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |