2003 BMW 325 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 325 would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2003 BMW 325. (192 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 265 kg more than 2003 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 325. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 325 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 325 | CTS |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 5664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.1 seconds | 4.7 seconds |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |