2003 BMW 325 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 325 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2003 BMW 325. (192 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 276 kg more than 2003 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 325. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 325 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 325 | CTS |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |