2003 BMW 325 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 325 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 325 (192 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (167 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 325 weights approximately 117 kg more than 2010 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 325 (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 325 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 325 | 3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1363 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.3 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |