2003 BMW 325 vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 325 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 325 (192 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 41 kg more than 2003 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 325 (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 325 | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 325 | Rogue |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1521 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.3 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |