2003 BMW 325 vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 325 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2003 BMW 325. (192 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 86 kg more than 2003 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Mustang (379 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 325. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 325 | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 325 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 379 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1566 kg |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |