2003 BMW 325 vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 325 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2003 BMW 325. (192 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 577 kg more than 2003 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 325. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 325 | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 325 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 83 mm |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2057 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.3 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 85 L |