2003 BMW 520 vs. 1968 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 2003 BMW 520 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2003 BMW 520. (167 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 545 kg more than 2003 BMW 520. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 501 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 520. (210 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 520 | 1968 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 520 | Calais |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 711 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 103.1 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |