2003 BMW 520 vs. 1997 Jeep Dakar
To start off, 2003 BMW 520 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Dakar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Dakar would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Dakar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Dakar (190 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2003 BMW 520. (167 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Dakar should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 520.
Because 2003 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Dakar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Jeep Dakar has automatic transmission and 2003 BMW 520 has manual transmission. 2003 BMW 520 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Jeep Dakar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 520 | 1997 Jeep Dakar | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 520 | Dakar |
Year Released | 2003 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2760 mm |