2003 BMW 520 vs. 1998 Buick Regal

To start off, 2003 BMW 520 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Buick Regal (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2003 BMW 520. (167 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 520 weights approximately 66 kg more than 1998 Buick Regal.

Because 2003 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Buick Regal (312 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 520. (210 Nm). This means 1998 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 520. 1998 Buick Regal has automatic transmission and 2003 BMW 520 has manual transmission. 2003 BMW 520 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Buick Regal will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW 520 1998 Buick Regal
Make BMW Buick
Model 520 Regal
Year Released 2003 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2171 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 167 HP 205 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 312 Nm
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 96.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 86.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1494 kg
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 2780 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]