2003 BMW 520 vs. 1999 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2003 BMW 520 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2003 BMW 520. (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 5 kg more than 2003 BMW 520. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 520 | 1999 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 520 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |