2003 BMW 520 vs. 2008 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2008 Jaguar XK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 520 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XK (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2003 BMW 520. (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XK weights approximately 40 kg more than 2003 BMW 520. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XK (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 520. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 520. 2008 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 2003 BMW 520 has manual transmission. 2003 BMW 520 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW 520 2008 Jaguar XK
Make BMW Jaguar
Model 520 XK
Year Released 2003 2008
Body Type Station Wagon Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2170 cc 4194 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 167 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 420 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 90.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.7:1 11.0:1
Top Speed 223 km/hour 250 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 9.5 seconds 6.2 seconds
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1670 kg 1710 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4800 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 2080 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.5 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.8 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.5 L/100km 11.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 71 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]