2003 BMW 520 vs. 2009 Jeep Commander

To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 520 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 2003 BMW 520. (167 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 520 weights approximately 167 kg more than 2009 Jeep Commander.

Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 BMW 520. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (527 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 520. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 520. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2003 BMW 520 has manual transmission. 2003 BMW 520 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW 520 2009 Jeep Commander
Make BMW Jeep
Model 520 Commander
Year Released 2003 2009
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2171 cc 5654 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 167 HP 358 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 527 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4350 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1393 kg
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Consumption 6.8 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13 L/100km 18.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]