2003 BMW 520 vs. 2013 Ford E-Series

To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 520 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (222 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2003 BMW 520. (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 520 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2013 Ford E-Series.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 520. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 520. 2013 Ford E-Series has automatic transmission and 2003 BMW 520 has manual transmission. 2003 BMW 520 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford E-Series will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW 520 2013 Ford E-Series
Make BMW Ford
Model 520 E-Series
Year Released 2003 2013
Body Type Station Wagon Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2170 cc 4600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 167 HP 222 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 387 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.7:1 9.38:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 4-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1670 kg 1450 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 5504 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 2017 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 2085 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 3505 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.5 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.8 L/100km 18.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 150 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]