2003 BMW 530 vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2003 BMW 530 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 530 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 530 weights approximately 840 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 530 (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 530 | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | BMW | ZAZ |
Model | 530 | 966 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2170 mm |