2003 BMW 530 vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 530 would be higher. At 3,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 530 (227 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (205 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 302 kg more than 2003 BMW 530.
Because 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 BMW 530. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 530 (300 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (290 Nm). This means 2003 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 530 | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
Make | BMW | Isuzu |
Model | 530 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 3163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 205 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 290 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1874 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |