2003 BMW 530 vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 530 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 530 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 1 kg more than 2003 BMW 530.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 530 (501 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 2003 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 530 | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 530 | B3000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 501 Nm | 240 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1671 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.5 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |