2003 BMW 530 vs. 2009 Peugeot Partner
To start off, 2009 Peugeot Partner is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 530 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 530 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2009 Peugeot Partner. (68 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2009 Peugeot Partner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 530 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2009 Peugeot Partner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW 530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW 530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Peugeot Partner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 530 (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Peugeot Partner. (125 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Peugeot Partner. 2003 BMW 530 has automatic transmission and 2009 Peugeot Partner has manual transmission. 2009 Peugeot Partner will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 BMW 530 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 530 | 2009 Peugeot Partner | |
Make | BMW | Peugeot |
Model | 530 | Partner |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1867 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.8:1 |
Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 142 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.1 seconds | 16.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |