2003 BMW 645 vs. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz

To start off, 2003 BMW 645 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 645 (310 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 645 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 482 kg more than 2003 BMW 645.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 645. (450 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 645.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW 645 1962 Cadillac Biarritz
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 645 Biarritz
Year Released 2003 1962
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4398 cc 6388 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 310 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 450 Nm 582 Nm
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82.7 mm 98.4 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1698 kg 2180 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 5650 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 3300 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 75 L