2003 BMW 645 vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2003 BMW 645 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW 645 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 645 (310 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 645 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 645 weights approximately 738 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 645 (450 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 BMW 645 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 645 | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 645 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1698 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2480 mm |