2003 BMW 645 vs. 1995 BMW CLS
To start off, 2003 BMW 645 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW 645 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 BMW 645. (310 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 645.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 645 (450 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2003 BMW 645 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2003 BMW 645 has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 BMW 645 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW 645 | 1995 BMW CLS | |
| Make | BMW | BMW |
| Model | 645 | CLS |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1360 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2710 mm |
