2003 BMW 645 vs. 2007 Ford E-250
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 645. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 645 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 645 (321 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 645 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 645 (450 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 BMW 645 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 645 | 2007 Ford E-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 645 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.5 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |