2003 BMW 730 vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 BMW 730 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 730 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 730 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 535 kg more than 2003 BMW 730.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 730. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 730.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW 730 | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 730 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3510 mm |