2003 BMW M3 vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW M3 weights approximately 342 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
Make | BMW | Maserati |
Model | M3 | A6G |
Year Released | 2003 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2560 mm |