2003 BMW M3 vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 250 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 1952 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | M3 | 40 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 78.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3090 mm |