2003 BMW M3 vs. 1956 DKW Munga
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW M3 weights approximately 162 kg more than 1956 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (300 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 1956 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | M3 | Munga |
Year Released | 2003 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |