2003 BMW M3 vs. 1958 Seat 600
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 323 more horse power than 1958 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW M3 weights approximately 809 kg more than 1958 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 1958 Seat 600 | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | M3 | 600 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |