2003 BMW M3 vs. 1959 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. (210 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 853 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW M3 | 1959 Cadillac Biarritz | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M3 | Biarritz |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 2295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 75 L |
