2003 BMW M3 vs. 1966 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW M3 weights approximately 147 kg more than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (300 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 1966 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | BMW | Isuzu |
Model | M3 | Bellel |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 40 L |