2003 BMW M3 vs. 1969 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2003 BMW M3. (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 558 kg more than 2003 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 1969 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | M3 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 6954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 79 L |