2003 BMW M3 vs. 1973 Subaru 1400
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Subaru 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Subaru 1400 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Subaru 1400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW M3 | 1973 Subaru 1400 | |
| Make | BMW | Subaru |
| Model | M3 | 1400 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1361 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 342 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
