2003 BMW M3 vs. 1974 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW M3 | 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | BMW | Suzuki |
| Model | M3 | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 3168 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 342 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
