2003 BMW M3 vs. 1977 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1977 Mercury Cougar. (133 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 470 kg more than 2003 BMW M3.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mercury Cougar. (336 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mercury Cougar.

Compare all specifications:

2003 BMW M3 1977 Mercury Cougar
Make BMW Mercury
Model M3 Cougar
Year Released 2003 1977
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3168 cc 4942 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 342 HP 133 HP
Engine RPM 7900 RPM 3400 RPM
Torque 350 Nm 336 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 1600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1385 kg 1855 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 5480 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2910 mm