2003 BMW M3 vs. 1977 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1977 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW M3 weights approximately 247 kg more than 1977 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (300 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW M3 | 1977 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | M3 | Mark II |
Year Released | 2003 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1442 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2590 mm |