2003 BMW M3 vs. 1988 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,168 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW M3 (342 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1988 Renault Megane. (250 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1988 Renault Megane.
Because 2003 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault Megane. (181 Nm). This means 2003 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW M3 | 1988 Renault Megane | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | M3 | Megane |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1988 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3168 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 342 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
